![]() ![]() ![]() We agreed to carry on as normal for now and revisit the whole area in six months or so. I'm even older than you OP so time is limited and I think it's an unfair position to put us in. Have been with bf for a few years now and presumed that marriage and babies were next on our agenda but when we talked about it lately he was giving me the "maybe down the line" spiel too. OP I am in the same position as you but I am female. ![]() I think it's fair that they're honest with eachother. On the other hand if she turns around in 5 years and decides "nope", then he has to start again, an older man looking to find a woman of his own age who is willing to have children.Īt the moment he has no idea what her plan is. So if someone is planning on having children, general consensus is to have children (or start having children) before 35 if it's feasible. Nothing wrong with that at all, but it's generally accepted that 35 is the age after which childbearing becomes increasingly risky for women (and the child). Which puts them both in their late 30's before they've had their first child. I don't think he's in a rush to have children now, but from the time you've had "the conversation", then set yourselves up to accomodate a child, then gone through the "motions" as it were, to pregnancy and childbirth you could be looking at the best part of two years. Im surprised no one else has had this opinion so far: your both still in your twenties and have only been together a year, whats the big rush to have children? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |